Now that this proposal about permission-less ITO passed the community voting, and the forum is online.
Can we discuss the details about it?
In order to avoid such loss and at the same time create more value and use cases of the $MASK token, we are proposing a $MASK deposit requirement for Permissionless ITO launching. The deposit will set a threshold to Permissionless ITO, and be the precautionary act if the launched ITO is found to be scammy later.